Telling a defendant who calls on the telephone that the judge always gives extensions of time to pay is proper or improper?

Telling a defendant who calls on the telephone that the judge always gives extensions of time to pay is proper or improper?

• A. Proper
• B. Improper
• C. Not specified
• D. Cannot be determined

Answer: (B)

Promising a guaranteed outcome from the judge is not appropriate. Saying on the phone that the judge “always” grants extensions to pay would mislead the defendant about how decisions are made and could be interpreted as an ex parte statement or improper coaching. Extensions are discretionary and depend on the specific facts, timing, and rules in place. The proper approach is to explain the available process for requesting more time—such as filing a motion or asking for a payment plan—and to note that any extension depends on the judge’s ruling after reviewing the case. Provide neutral, accurate information about deadlines and procedures, not assurances about outcomes.

Promising a guaranteed outcome from the judge is not appropriate. Saying on the phone that the judge “always” grants extensions to pay would mislead the defendant about how decisions are made and could be interpreted as an ex parte statement or improper coaching. Extensions are discretionary and depend on the specific facts, timing, and rules in place. The proper approach is to explain the available process for requesting more time—such as filing a motion or asking for a payment plan—and to note that any extension depends on the judge’s ruling after reviewing the case. Provide neutral, accurate information about deadlines and procedures, not assurances about outcomes.